Saturday, 31 January 2026

Reading List: January.

Fiction: 
 
Nat Cassidy: When the Wolf Comes Home. 
Sarah Gailey: Just Like Home. 
R.O. Kwon: Exhibit. 
R.O. Kwon: Incendiaries. 
Kevin Chen: Ghost Town. 
Han Kang: The Vegetarian. 
Han Kang: Human Acts. 
Hang Kang: We Do Not Part. 
Clarissa Goenawan: The Perfect World of Miwako Sumida. 
Elizabeth Jolley: The Well.
 
Films
 
Daedosiui sarangbeob (2024, Eon-hee Lee). 
Affeksjonsverdi (2025, Joachim Trier). 
Happyend (2024, Neo Sora). 
Chan hang rawang rao (2025, Jirassaya Wongsutin). 
Yunhui-ege (2019, Dae Hyung Lim). 
Yeon-ae-dam (2016, Hyun-ju Lee).  
Beolsae (2018, Kim Bo-ra).
Lü ye (2023, Shuai Han).
Peter Hujar's Day (2025, Ira Sachs).
 
Shows
 
Jabaekui Daega, Season One. 
Shards of Her, Season One. 

Tuesday, 27 January 2026

Monday, 26 January 2026

Yunhui-ege (Moonlit Winter)

The snow in the Hokkaido town of Otaru builds up in dunes, covering sidewalks and cars. One of the main character’s aunt describes what it means to live with it through winter: you shovel it, it builds up again, you shovel it again. Life is the constant process of excavating a pathway, again and again, until winter passes. It’s a powerful symbol in Dae Hyung Lim’s film about buried feelings, about two lives derailed early and tragically by societal pressure. 
Yoon-he (Kim Hee-ae) lives in Korea with her teenage daughter Sae-bom (Kim So-hye). She is recently divorced from her husband and her daughter is about to graduate high school and attend university in Seoul, so this is a turning point in her life, an expected emptiness that may hold the potential for change. Jun (Yûko Nakamura) has been living in Japan since her own parents divorced and is sharing her life with her aunt. They seem to have built a comfortable routine around her work as a veterinarian and the running of a cosy cafe in town. Both women have built a life away from each other but they are also living in an arrested state of suspense, as if their lives since their forced separation has evolved in ways that they didn’t get to choose. Jun writes a letter, it reaches Yoon-he’s daughter, who decides to take her mother for a holiday in Otaru to learn more about her. 

Moonlit Winter could have been a film about rekindled feelings, with flashbacks of what Jun and Yoon-he shared in the past: instead the profoundness of their connection is made clear in how it has left them adrift in their present, clear in Yoon-he’s loneliness and unhappiness, her isolation and inability to communicate her feelings to her daughter, who is desperate to know her, and in Jun’s unwillingness to consider a new relationship (reacting with almost violent frustration at the suggestion of marriage, turning down a potential suitor by insisting that she too keep her private feelings to herself, in case she is met with same societal condemnation she once was) with someone else after all these years. It’s more about how their interrupted love has affected their personal relationships with other people in the present, especially between Yoon-hee and her daughter, who perceives her mother’s loneliness and unhappiness but doesn’t know why they are so profound. Sae-bom, an aspiring photographer, is trying to get to know her mother through this trip into the past, and there is a beautiful symmetry to the idea that what originally caused her to be so remote, distant, unreachable could now be the reason for a new intimacy and closeness found in having a better understanding of one another. 

The actual reunion, bittersweet and tender, happens late in the film, and feels like a catalyst, like a circle closing so that the characters can finally live lives closer to what they were meant to have, without the outside pressure and the damage of non-acceptance. It’s not the ending you might expect from a film about two past lovers reconnecting but it resonates deeply regardless. 

2019, directed by Dae Hyung Lim, starring Kim Hee-ae, Yûko Nakamura, Kim So-hye, Sung Yoo-bin, Hana Kino.

Tuesday, 13 January 2026

Happyend

Neo Sora’s Happyend, about a friendship between a group of high schoolers and more intimately about two boys who have known each other for years but are now threatening to grow apart, is one of the most compelling portraits of individuals living through the ascent of fascism. It is set in what feels like a very near future: everything except some minor advancements in (surveillance) technology looks the same as it does now. Connected by a passion for music, especially EDM, these teenagers hunt for the exhilarating experience of sound wherever they can find it, even if it lands them right in the middle of a police raid on an underground concert. Their passion is palpable, the sheer joy of sharing these moments, but the overbearing forces of state control intrude on it already before the true horrors have even begun. Worse, the signs of what will ultimately divide them is already visible in how their stakes differ: Yuta (Hayato Kurihara) is Japanese, and the police pass over him after a quick face scan, but Kou (Yukito Hidaka) is only a resident, even though his family has lived in Japan for four generations, and falls under additional, terrorising scrutiny that will follow his throughout the film. 
It begins with a prank. The film establishes the stakes, the context, through videos of a Japanese Prime Minister thirsting to use the threat of a predicted big earthquake as a thin excuse to establish a totalitarian state, raising fears about migrants to justify an escalating surveillance regime, utilising fear for his political aim of gaining more power. These little snippets are like background noise: they happen on ever-present screens, but the reality for these teenagers is still the small world of their high school, where they get to follow their passion for music in the music lab, where the visible regime of control isn’t the greater political apparatus, but the small-minded little dictator of a principal who parks his ridiculous yellow sports car for all to see. The morning after the aborted concert, Yuto dares Kou to topple the car. The result looks like a piece of sculptural art, eagerly filmed by the students. It is a prank, but in the context of the world these kids now live in, the principal, furious, misconstrues it as an act of terrorism that justifies his institution of a surveillance system in the school that automatically deducts points for any infringement. Something as small as not wearing the correct uniform – one of their friends likes wearing a skirt instead of trousers – results in demerits, creating an atmosphere of fear that no longer allows for expression of individuality. 

While the surrounding world becomes increasingly erratic, dominated by pro- and anti-government protests that are met with violence from the security forces, the smaller world of the high school begins mirroring those wider conflicts. Kou, more affected by the open racism where whether or not he is required to carry his residency card on him has become irrelevant because there are no limits to the power police can exert, begins to think of the wider picture, spurred on by Fumi (Kilala Inori), a politically active student who is trying to find ways to push back against their principal, who insists on fighting back against the intolerable even if it comes at a personal cost. She advocates for her non-Japanese fellow students who are being increasingly marginalised, and the general apathy in the student body that stays quiet in the face of the escalation, or even accommodating. Yuto remains as he always has been, pursuing his passion for music, but otherwise politically naive. The gap between them widens up to a point where Kou wonders if they would even be friends if they met now, but the film never falls into the despair of an irretrievably broken friendship: instead, they come back to one another, even as their graduation puts them on separate courses in life and Yuto, realising that there is less at stake for him personally than for his friend, steps up to protect him. 

All of this makes Happyend an incredibly prescient film to watch in these first weeks of 2026, where the limits of tolerating the intolerable are becoming more and more clear. 


2024, directed by Neo Sora, starring Makiko Watanabe, Yukito Hidaka, Ayumu Nakajima, Arazi, Shina Peng, Kosuke Tanaka, Kilala Inori, Hayato Kurihara, Shirô Sano, Yûta Hayashi.

Monday, 12 January 2026

Chan hang rawang rao (Flat Girls)

I don’t know what a good entry point for writing about this film is: it hit me as a complete surprise, the kind of quiet story that gets stuck in your brain and just keeps growing in significance as it bounces around in there. It’s a small, slice-of-life tale that covers maybe a year of life in a run-down, lively Bangkok apartment block: a place that has a communal badminton court where the lights keep breaking, where the apartments units don’t seem to have enough space for the people they contain, where there is a constant worry about the future, the precarity of making rent. Downstairs, there’s a place reserved for secret, illegal gambling, where much of the misery that follows some characters around is magnified. 
The film follows two teenage girls who have grown up together, are best friends, and are both struggling to figure out if what they feel for each other goes beyond friendship. The two girls may live in the same place, but otherwise their situations are different enough that the gulf threatens the core of their relationship. Ann (Fatima Dechawaleekul) is the overburdened older daughter of a woman with a gambling addiction. Her father, a police officer, has died on the line of duty, threatening the family’s right to remain in this apartment block reserved for serving police officers. She is helping her mother by caring for her siblings, taking on small jobs. There seems to be no way out for her: as much as she dreams of being a stewardess, she knows that in the end, her economic circumstances determine her path in life, and the realistic way out is either joining the police herself, or marrying. Jane (Fairy Kirana Pipityakorn) is the only child of the woman who collects rent in the apartment complex and has enough pull and influence to advocate for others when they fall behind on their payments. Her family is considering purchasing a house and leaving – for much of the film, Ann fears losing the safety of having a roof over her head while Jane struggles with having to leave everything she knows behind for a place that is more luxurious and allows more space and safety. 
Then, the film throws policeman Tong (Boy Pakorn Chadborirak) into the mix. He’s in his thirties, but recruited by Jane’s forever-body-shaming mum to help her daughter lose weight. It’s a point in the film where things could go different, where a grown man enters the established routines of two teenage girls and proves to be a predator, but instead, there’s a tenderness in how he begins to truly care for both Ann and Jane, how he fits into their dynamic and provides them with a kind of freedom (mostly through his access to a car) while respectfully stepping back when he knows he should. If he upsets the dynamic, it’s by accident: the film doesn’t explicitly talk about Jane’s relationship to gender but there are enough hints here that something is going on. She wears a binder, and her growing relationship with Tong exists on a spectrum between admiration and attraction that can’t quite decide if she wants or wants to be. The question of the nature of the relationship between Ann and Jane is similarly subtle, as the growing financial pressure on Ann’s family muddles things. When they kiss, Jane pretends that it affects her less than she thought it would, but Ann is the one who seems radically changed, to have realised something about herself that she can’t quite afford to put in words. In any case, Ann argues, love if for people who have money, and as much as Jane supports her dreams, Ann knows they are tragically unattainable. 
The second half of the film becomes more complex, with the film once again refusing to clearly spell out everything for the viewer, leaving it to interpretation. Tong may genuinely have feelings for Ann or be driven by an instinct to help in the only way that he is allowed to. In any case, he fades into the background as Ann’s mother’s gambling addiction puts her family into peril, as the inevitable moment of separation arrives. Still, the thing that will stay with me is Tong’s insistence on treating others with kindness, of telling Jane that happiness is a more worthwhile pursuit than riches, especially in a place where other adults seem to be constantly locked in a fight for survival, seem to be too selfish to see their daughters as people with their own ideas about what they want their lives to be. 


2025, directed by Jirassaya Wongsutin, starring Fairy Kirana Pipityakorn, Fatima Dechawaleekul, Boy Pakorn Chadborirak.

Friday, 9 January 2026

Affeksjonsverdi (Sentimental Value)

I wrote it for you. You're the only one who can play it.

So with the house empty and the doors locked and the mattresses rolled round, those stray airs, advance guards of great armies, blustered in, brushed bare boards, nibbled and fanned, met nothing in bedroom or drawing-room that wholly resisted them but only hangings that flapped, wood that creaked, the bare legs of tables, saucepans and china already furred, tarnished, cracked. What people had shed and left -- a pair of shoes, a shooting cap, some faded skirts and coats in wardrobes -- those alone kept the human shape and in the emptiness indicated how once they were filled and animated; how once hands were busy with hooks and buttons; how once the looking-glass had held a face; had held a world hollowed out in which a figure turned, a hand flashed, the door opened, in came children rushing and tumbling; and went out again.


Virginia Woolf: To the Lighthouse

This house in Joachim Trier’s Sentimental Value, my favourite film of his since Oslo, 31. august, holds generations of a family, memories going back decades, a century. People have been born and have died in this house. It made me think of how the rooms of my grandparents’ house in which I spent summers are inscribed in my brain more than any place that I ever actually lived in: built by my grandfather, it held something more than the suburban home of my childhood, and it appears often in my dreams, years after it has been sold and therefore lost to me forever. 
Trier uses this house to tell the story of his characters: Gustav Borg (Stellan Skarsgård), an aging and well-respected film director who hasn’t finished a project in a long time, spent his childhood there, witnessed his mother’s suicide, then moved away, and later raised his two daughters Nora (Renate Reinsve) and Agnes (Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas) there with his wife, until a divorce and an abandonment that sits at the centre of the film like a bleeding wound. The house itself has a literal crack in it, a foundational fault, one that feels like it symbolises the pain and hurt that has existed in the family: in Nora’s childhood, she once did a project on a house that imagined it as a living being with preferences, for being full, or maybe empty and silent, lived in, for holding life, but the crack in the wall made it feel like the house had been slowly collapsing ever since it was built, threatening to take its inhabitants with it, suspending them in a slow fall towards the ground. 
 
At the beginning of the film, Gustav is about to return to Oslo, and his children are packing up the decades of memories, all the keepsakes that have filled the house, readying it for a potential sale. It’s the kind of task that makes it impossible not to ruminate on what has happened in the past. Agnes, now a historian, is investigating the family history, specifically a first wound. Gustav’s mother, arrested during the German occupation for anti-Nazi activities, was tortured in prison – we see her flicking through the horrifying pages of the re-enactment, imagining the grandmother she never met and how she would have returned carrying that trauma into Gustav’s childhood. Gustav has written a script, his most personal yet, and wants his daughter Nora, who is now a successful stage and television actress (with horrifying stage fright), to play his own mother. The script is written for her, but she can not forgive that he left them in childhood, and every interaction these two have with each other is terse and ends in an argument. Gustav does not value the theatre (he dislikes that she acts in centuries-old plays – he likes her acting, but not the format), he thinks television is too small for her. He does not show up for her premieres. Nora turns him down because she cannot be around her father for too long. Gustav only knows how to express himself through writing, but his profession, his obsession with his art, was the reason for his leaving: he could not figure out how to be an artist and a father at the same time, he could not show up for his family and create at the same time. Even with his grandson, he only connects through (profoundly age-inappropriate) films: for Christmas, he gifts a parcel full of DVDs, including Haneke’s The Piano Teacher of all things (“to help him learn about the maternal instinct” he explains, luckily Agnes does not have a DVD player). He loves and is proud of his daughters but the only way he knows to include them, to be around them, is to make films with them. We see a retrospective film screening of a movie he made 20 years ago with Agnes, the younger daughter, that must have been close to the last thing he completed before he left them. Agnes is fantastic in it but she did not become an actress, as if something about the experience deterred her.


 
Instead of Nora, Gustav casts Rachel Kemp (Elle Fanning). He is charmed by her adoration for him and his films, and her involvement means funding – from Netflix, of all places, an arrangement that seems doomed from the start for a director who has such a clear conception of complete artistic freedom and disdain for economic constraints. It reminded me of Olivier Assayas’ 2022 Irma Vep show, a thinly veiled satire about the director making a series about his own film, made by HBO – as much about film production conditions in the 2020s as it was about his personal life. They work on the script together in the house. Gustav is deliberately elusive about how much of this story is truly his, about what is authentic and what isn’t – in one scene claiming his mother used a footstool to hang herself that his daughter, in on the joke, identifies as being from IKEA. Rachel is excited for the project but realises soon that she is only a second choice. Gustav asks her to die her hair the same colour of Nora, and meeting her, she realises that she is a stand-in for someone else, an obvious approximation because she is forcing this personal story of Gustav’s childhood trauma – his mother hanging herself in the house when he was seven - to be translated into English. There is a conflict here, an alienation and mis-translation: hoping to bridge it, she practices a fake Scandinavian accent so that the difference between her and the other actors in the film won’t stand out too much, but it becomes obvious immediately that this is a fundamentally flawed undertaking that threatens to undermine the film. Rachel is genuine and passionate enough about the project to drop out in time. 

Gustav’s script, once Agnes reads it, hesitant to allow her own son to perform the role of Gustav in it, appears several times throughout the film: Gustav carries it around in a plastic bag, Nora refuses to read it because reading it would be a concession to her father, or it might reveal something about him she isn’t ready to face. In reading it, Agnes realises that it is a love letter to Nora more than Gustav’s mother: it may have been written about Agnes’ grandmother, but it was written for Nora, with Gustav, who they think unaware of Nora’s own suicide attempt, managing to write about it like it indirectly through his mother’s death. It’s like the crack in the house, persisting through the decades, unavoidable, a repeating pattern in their family history. The film is about the terse relationship between the two sisters and their fathers, but it is at its most moving when it shows how Nora and Agnes survived their childhood together, and especially, how Nora made the kind of childhood for Agnes that allowed her to thrive, and eventually make her own family, because she was not alone and had someone care for her when her parents didn’t. “I had you”, Agnes says in the pivotal scene of the film. Gustav’s insistence that life irritates art so much that he had to leave to continue making films is undermined: instead, what the house held in all those years was the two sisters and love for each other. In the end, the house itself is transformed, completely stripped of its history by a pre-sale transformation that turns it into the kind of indistinguishable canvas of every 2020s trend in interior decoration. Grey surfaces, new floorboards, empty surfaces, undistinguishable furniture, the crack presumably plastered and painted over, it has died, in a way, become separated from its history and how it intertwines with the Borgs. Instead, Gustav is finally filming his film on a sound stage which through the presence of the actors and the story alone becomes authentic. It’s not a home that has ever held people, but it is ready to hold their lives regardless. transposed into the present tense, with Nora in the leading role and her nephew acting alongside her, the story loses none of its poignancy, because it is about the people that Gustav, in his own lacking way, loves. 

2025, directed by Joachim Trier, starring Renate Reinsve, Stellan Skarsgård, Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas, Elle Fanning, Anders Danielsen Lie, Øyvind Hesjedal Loven. 

Thursday, 8 January 2026

A dangerous precedent


 “The Secretary-General is deeply alarmed by the recent escalation in Venezuela, culminating with today’s United States military action in the country, which has potential worrying implications for the region,” said a statement issued by UN Spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric.
“Independently of the situation in Venezuela, these developments constitute a dangerous precedent. The Secretary-General continues to emphasize the importance of full respect - by all - of international law, including the UN Charter,” the statement continued.
“He’s deeply concerned that the rules of international law have not been respected.”
 
 
"Concerns over the future of the territory resurfaced after Trump's unilateral use of military force against Venezuela on Saturday to seize its President Nicolás Maduro.
The Trump administration says Greenland is vital to US security. Denmark says an attack would end the Nato military alliance.
"If the president identifies a threat to the national security of the United States, every president retains the option to address it through military means," Rubio said on Wednesday.
"As a diplomat, which is what I am now, and what we work on, we always prefer to settle it in different ways - that included in Venezuela."
Earlier in the day, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said Rubio had "ruled out the possibility of an invasion" of Greenland in a phone call with him.